<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gravity Search Marketing &#187; seo url writing tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourseoplan.com/tag/seo-url-writing-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com</link>
	<description>Expert SEO Consulting &#38; SEO Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic Website SEO Terror Level Downgraded to Yellow</title>
		<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/seo-dynamic-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourseoplan.com/seo-dynamic-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles and interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google webmaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo dynamic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo url writing tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.shocklab.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search engines now include dynamically-generated pages in their indexes, but some particulars of dynamic pages can still be obstacles to getting indexed. Follow the guidelines here to avoid major pitfalls of dynamic sites.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h2>Dynamic content used to be a red flag for search engine friendly design, but times have changed. Search engines now include dynamically-generated pages in their indexes, but some particulars of dynamic pages can still be obstacles to getting indexed.</h2>
<p>Whether it’s keeping in synch with inventory or updating a blog, more than likely if you’re a website owner you have some level of dynamic or CMS-managed content on your site (and if not, you should really be looking into it for your next redesign). Follow the guidelines here to avoid major pitfalls and ensure that your dynamic body of work is search engine friendly from head to toe.</p>
<blockquote>
<h3>Rule #1: Be sure that search engines can follow regular HTML links to all pages on your site.</h3>
<p>Any website needs individually linkable URLs for all unique pages on the site.   This way every page can be bookmarked and deep linked by users, and indexed by search engines.  But dynamic websites have an additional concern: making sure the search engine robots can reach all of these pages.</p>
<p>For example, suppose you have a form on your website: you ask people to select their location from a pull-down, and then when people submit the form your website generates a page with content that is specifically written for that geographical area.  Search engine robots don&#8217;t fill out forms or select from pull-down menus, so there will be no way for them to get to that page.</p>
<p>This problem can be easily remedied by providing standard &lt;a href&gt; type HTML links that point to all of your dynamic pages. The easiest way to do this is to add these links to your site map.</p>
<h3>Rule #2: Set up an XML site map if you can’t create regular HTML links to all of your pages, or if it appears that search engines are having trouble indexing your pages.</h3>
<p>If you have a large (10K pages or more) dynamic site, or you don’t think that providing static HTML links is an option, you can use an XML site map to tell search engines the locations of all your pages.</p>
<p>Most website owners tell Google and Yahoo! about their site maps through the search engines&#8217; respective webmaster tools (Links:<a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps"> Google</a> <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/">Yahoo!</a>). But if you&#8217;re an early adopter, you should look into the new system whereby a site map can be easily designated in the robots.txt file using <a href="http://blog.ask.com/2007/04/sitemaps_autodi.html">sitemap autodiscovery</a>. Ask.com, Google and Yahoo! currently support this feature. Cool!</p>
<h3>Rule #3: If you must use dynamic URLs, keep them short and tidy</h3>
<p>Another potential problem &#8211; and this is one that is subject to some debate &#8211; is with dynamic pages that have too many parameters in the URL.  Google itself in its webmaster guidelines states the following: &#8220;If you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e., the URL contains a &#8220;?&#8221; character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and the number of them few.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here are a few guidelines you should follow for your website parameters:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limit the number of parameters in the URL to a maximum of 2</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Use the parameter &#8220;?id=&#8221; only when in reference to a session id </span> [this is no longer a problem.]</li>
<li>Be sure that the URL functions if all dynamic items are removed</li>
<li>Be sure your internal links are consistent &#8211; always link with parameters in the same order and format</li>
</ul>
<h3>Rule #4: Avoid dynamic-looking URLs if possible</h3>
<p>Besides being second-class citizens of search, dynamic-looking URLs are also less attractive to your human visitors.  Most people prefer to see URLs that clearly communicate the content on the page.  Since reading the URL is one of the ways that people decide whether to click on a listing in search engines, you are much better off having a URL that looks like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://www.yoursite.com/church-bells/discount/</span></p></blockquote>
<p>rather than this:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://www.yourseite.com/prod.php?id=23485&amp;blt=234</span></p></blockquote>
<p>We also think that static-looking, “human-readable” URLs are more likely to receive inbound links, because some people will be less inclined to link to pages with very long or complicated URLs.</p>
<p>Furthermore, keywords in a URL are a factor, admittedly not a huge one, in search engine ranking algorithms. Notice how, in the above example, the static URL contains the keywords “discount” and “church bells” while the dynamic URL does not.</p>
<p>There are many tools available that will re-create a dynamic site in static form.  There are also tools that will re-write your URLs, if you have too many parameters, to &#8220;look&#8221; like regular non-dynamic URLS.  We think these are both good options for dynamic Intrapromote has a helpful post on <a href="http://seoblog.intrapromote.com/2006/02/url_rewriting_d.html">dynamic URL rewriting</a>.</p>
<h3>Rule #5: De-index stubs and search results</h3>
<p>Have you heard of “website stubs?”  These are pages that are generated by dynamic sites but really have no independent content on them.  For example, if your website is a shopping cart for toys, there may be a page generated for the category “Age 7-12 Toys” but you may not actually have any products in this category.  Stub pages are very annoying to searchers, and search engines, by extension, would like to prevent them from displaying in their results.  So do us all a favor and either figure out a way to get rid of these pages, or exclude them from indexing using the robots.txt file or robots meta tag.</p>
<p>Search results from within your website is another type of page for which Google has stated a dislike: “Typically, web search results don’t add value to users, and since our core goal is to provide the best search results possible, we generally exclude search results from our web search index.” Here’s our advice: either make sure your search results pages <em>add value for the searcher </em>(perhaps by containing some unique content related to the searched term), or exclude them from indexing using the robots.txt file or robots meta tag.</p>
<h3>Bonus Points: Handling duplicate content</h3>
<p>While it&#8217;s not a problem that&#8217;s specific to dynamic sites, this rule is one that dynamic sites are more likely to break than static ones. <del datetime="2009-12-15T21:29:08+00:00">If multiple pages on your site display materials that are identical or nearly identical, duplicates should be excluded from indexing using the robots.txt file or a robots meta tag.  Think of it this way: you don’t want all your duplicate pages competing with each other on the search engines.  Choose a favorite, and exclude the rest.</del> <em>[Editor's note: we no longer (2009) recommend de-indexing duplicate content. A better approach is to either redirect your duplicate pages to the primary page using a server-side, 301 redirect, or to set up a &lt;link rel="canonical"&gt; tag for any page that has been duplicated. A good explanation of best practices for handling duplicate content in 2009 can be found at <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/canonical-link-tag/">Matt Cutts' Blog</a>]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Dynamic content is usually timely and useful, which is why users love it, and the search engines want to list it. And now you know how to help your dynamic website reach its full search engine potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourseoplan.com/seo-dynamic-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops, I Redesigned My Website! An SEO Checklist</title>
		<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/website-redesign-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourseoplan.com/website-redesign-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles and interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo domain tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo url writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo web analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo website development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.shocklab.com/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you recently redesigned your website without thinking about the effect on its search engine presence, you may be in for a rude awakening. Follow a few simple guidelines to be sure that your fabulous new site isn't going incognito.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h2>A website redesign is a time for celebration! But if you recently redesigned your website without thinking about the effect on its search engine presence, you may be in for a rude awakening. Follow a few simple guidelines to be sure that your fabulous new site isn&#8217;t going incognito.</h2>
<p>One question that we are asked over and over again is this: &#8220;I just redesigned my website.  How can I make sure that I don&#8217;t lose my search engine rankings?&#8221;</p>
<p>If you just launched a redesigned website, or you are about to go through a revamp, we&#8217;ve made this checklist for you.  Follow it, and your grand debut won&#8217;t become a search engine flop.</p>
<h2>You Never Know What You&#8217;ve Got Until It&#8217;s Gone</h2>
<p>How did visitors get to your old site? Knowing this will help you know where to focus your efforts when reclaiming lost traffic.  For a meaningful baseline, dig up this information about your old site:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Conversions.</strong> Do you have any data on sales, leads, or other performance of your old website?  Make a note of it so that you can compare it against the new site.</li>
<li><strong>Search Engine Rankings.</strong> Did you track your old site&#8217;s search engine ranks? Is your new website targeting the same keywords? If so, you&#8217;ll want to keep a record of your old site&#8217;s ranks as a baseline. You can learn the best way to track search engine ranks in chapter 6 of our book, <a onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/homepage/purchaseAmazon');" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&amp;tag=yourseoplan-20&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F0470226641%2F">SEO: An Hour Day</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=yourseoplan-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />, and you can record your rankings on our downloadable <a href="../book/templates-worksheets/">SEO rank tracking worksheet</a>.</li>
<li><strong>URL &#8220;Hot List.&#8221; </strong>What were the most visited pages on your old website? And, what were the most common entry pages (the pages that your audience come to first)? These pages will be your highest priorities for &#8220;cleanup time&#8221; tasks (we&#8217;ll explain below).</li>
<li><strong>Inbound Links.</strong> It&#8217;s important to know how many other sites are linking to your old website – especially if you&#8217;re changing URLs. While the previous tasks in this list require some recordkeeping before the new site is live, this is one you can do just as well after launch.  See our <a href="../search-shortcuts/">handy search shortcuts</a> page to learn how to find out who&#8217;s linking to your site.</li>
</ul>
<h2>On the Day of Launch: Handle With Care</h2>
<p>With key background info in hand, you&#8217;ll be in a good position to manage your site redesign with care. Here are some site launch best practices for a website redesign:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Avoid Changing URLs. </strong>Keep as many of your old URLs as possible. Don&#8217;t change your domain name if you can avoid it!</li>
<li><strong>Page Redirects &#8211; Must happen concurrent with launch. </strong>In an ideal world, every URL from your old website would redirect to an appropriate page on your new website.  But we know that this can be hard to achieve in reality.  So try this on for size: using <em>a server-side 301 setting</em> (your IT people will know what this is) redirect the following pages, in order of priority:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Your Website Home Page (be sure you get all the variations – index.asp, index.php, or whatever you have)</li>
<li>Any Pages with Special Status (i.e,. Customer Support) That Make Them Important to your Business</li>
<li>Your Top Entry Pages</li>
<li>Your Top Most Popular Pages</li>
<li>Pages on the Path to Conversion (the pages that visitors often visited on their journey from entering the site to converting)</li>
<li>Any Other Pages on the Website.</li>
</ol>
<p>Don&#8217;t delay this step &#8211; you need the redirects in place before the search engine robots come back and visit your site. And be sure, when setting up the redirect, that each page from your old site goes to a well-chosen landing page on your new site – not just the home page!</p>
<p>P.S.: Looking to go techie? Here&#8217;s a link to an <a href="http://www.stevenhargrove.com/redirect-web-pages/">excellent guide to redirects in all sorts of languages</a> (PHP, .htaccess, Ruby on Rails and so on).</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li><strong>Server Downtime.</strong> It probably goes without saying that server downtime is to be avoided; however, most reports we&#8217;ve read say that Google will come back again if a page fails once. Here are some tips if you&#8217;re<a href="../experts-move-server-seo/"> moving your website to a different server</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Internal Links.</strong> No website is immune to broken links – even your own. After a redesign be sure to run a link validator on your website to be sure that those internal links have all been updated properly. These are available <a href="../seo-blogs-tools/">online</a> or using website development software (in Adobe Dreamweaver, for example, select Site &gt; Check Links Sitewide).</li>
<li><strong>File Not Found Page.</strong> As a result of all the potential broken links listed above, your audience will probably see the &#8220;File Not Found&#8221; Page more often than usual after a site redesign.  Be sure it&#8217;s well written and explains the situation. (&#8220;To better serve our customers, we have redesigned our website&#8221; is good; &#8220;404 Error!  The URL you have typed is incorrect!&#8221; is not.)  Better yet, include links to those most-popular pages you figured out earlier.</li>
</ul>
<h2>After Launch</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Monitor 404 errors.</strong> After your new site launches, keep an eye on your website stats, so you can see if there are a large number of &#8220;File Not Found&#8221; errors showing up for a particular URL. You can also see a list of broken links at Google Webmaster Tools. Any pages with a large number of errors should recieve 301 redirects.</li>
<li><strong>Inbound Links.</strong> There may be dozens or hundreds of links all over the web linking to non-existent URLs on your website.  Each of these should receive a polite request for an update – but don&#8217;t hold your breath.  In our experience, less than half of these requests result in an update. If you&#8217;ve got analytics in place, you can review which links are sending the most traffic and pester in order of importance.</li>
<li><strong>Directory Listings.</strong> Really just a special case of &#8220;inbound links,&#8221; directory listings deserve a little special attention.  Take the time to submit whatever form you need to make sure that they are linking to the correct URLs.</li>
<li><strong>XML Sitemap.</strong> Today&#8217;s search engines are smart enough to follow a 301 redirect through to a new page and index it properly – with no loss in search engine presence.  How long will this take?  We&#8217;ve seen it take 3 months before an old site is entirely flushed.  Can you speed up the process?  Maybe. Some SEOs swear by XML Sitemaps for getting pages indexed quickly. We haven&#8217;t seen this in action, but it certainly wouldn&#8217;t hurt. Here is a helpful article on <a href="http://www.larryweaver.com/blog/2006/11/how-to-submit-your-xml-site-map-to.asp">how to submit your sitemaps</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>We know what you&#8217;re thinking: You worked so hard on your shiny new website, and just when you want to kick back and relax a little, we&#8217;ve created a substantial new pile of work for you. Is it worth it? Absolutely! You don&#8217;t want your redesign to turn away your most desirable visitors – people who are actively trying to come to your site! You could hand all this traffic over to your competitors, or you could identify your best sources of traffic, and take important steps to keep them coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourseoplan.com/website-redesign-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Experts: Links, Tags, and File Names &#8211; Quickie SEO Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-quick-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-quick-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ask the experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo url writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo website development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.shocklab.com/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our "short form" responses to a reader's questions about on-page optimization.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Q: I am currently reading your book &#8220;Search Engine Optimization &#8211; An Hour A Day&#8221;. It has some excellent instruction. Having created a few sites that thankfully have ranked well in the search engines, I&#8217;m looking for answers to a few specific questions. Could you possibly answer some of them? Feel free to be brief.</h3>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Do you place value in naming a file after the main keyword on the page?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> Yes, there is some value in this. But don&#8217;t make it too long &#8211; you don&#8217;t want a 20 word list. And separate your keywords with dashes or underscores.</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Do you place value in using &lt;H1&gt; header tags for the page title in the body section?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> We lean toward &#8220;Yes.&#8221; &lt;H1&gt; tags probably improve the weight of the words inside the tag. This is a fairly minor factor, and because it&#8217;s so easy to manipulate, we expect that its importance will diminish over time (if not already).</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Is there value in placing the body text higher up on the body page and having navigation links follow after? That is, so that the SE&#8217;s see the keyword-rich text section first?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> This probably doesn&#8217;t affect ranks for the keyword, but it may affect how your listing displays. Body text will likely create an easier to read &#8220;snippet&#8221; than navigation, so it should go higher on the page than navigation text if possible.</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Shouldn&#8217;t navigation links always be text-based where possible?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> Yes.</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: What is the maximum number of links that a site map should point to?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> We think 100 links is a good rule of thumb for a max.</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Would it be a good idea to link to all 100 of my pages from the home page?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> As far as search engines are concerned, having such a large number of links from your home page would &#8220;dilute&#8221; the significance of each link. It&#8217;s not really a penalty, but we generally recommend focusing on a smaller number of top landing pages. More importantly, 100 links from your home page is not likely to be a good design for your human audience.</p></blockquote>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Q: Should all website keywords be included in the META keywords tag?</h4>
<blockquote><p><strong>A:</strong> While Meta keywords are a minor factor, we see no harm in including your top keywords in them. And this tag is a good place to include alternate spellings or misspellings of your keywords that you wouldn&#8217;t feel comfortable adding to your site&#8217;s visible text.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-quick-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Experts: Should I Have Dashes In My Domain Name?</title>
		<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-dashes-in-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-dashes-in-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ask the experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo domain tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo url writing tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.shocklab.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no major problem with dashes in domain names. The main reason that we chose not to use one, and that we generally advise against dashes, is that hyphenated names don't pass the "radio test." ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><h3>Q: I noticed you don&#8217;t have dashes in your domain name (your-seo-plan.com). Why? Is there anything wrong with them?</h3>
<p><strong>A:</strong> There is no major problem with dashes in domain names. The main reason that we chose not to use one, and that we generally advise against dashes, is that hyphenated names don&#8217;t pass the &#8220;radio test.&#8221; The radio test is this: if you had to say your domain name on the radio, would people know how to spell it, or would you need to spell it out? So, names like &#8220;wherehouse.com&#8221; or &#8220;civil-litigation-firm.com&#8221; have a problem because every time you give out the URL in person or over the phone you will have to spell it out. That means it&#8217;s harder for people to remember and communicate to others!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s well-known in the SEO industry that search engines are aware of hyphens and perceive them as spaces (see Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/">Matt Cutts on the subject of dashes and underscores</a> ). However, we generally advise against using too many words, as a Google engineer wrote: &#8220;you can have too much of a good thing. It also doesn’t take a special tool to know that this page name isn’t user-friendly:<br />
african-elephants-and-their-habitats-and-diet-and-history-and-extinction-possibilities-and-this-page-is-really-great.htm&#8221;</p>
<p>While we generally avoid dashes in domain names, this advice does not apply to filenames. We <em>do</em> recommend that dashes be used in filenames to separate out keywords. For example, the file name: &#8220;seo-advice.html&#8221; is preferable to &#8220;seoadvice.html&#8221;. Similarly, it is a good idea to use a seperator in folder names. This not only helps search engines, it also helps your human audience understand what the page is about, as you can see when you compare these two examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>without dashes: <strong>http://www.yourseoplan.com/seotips/googlelovesme.html</strong></li>
<li>with dashes:<strong> http://www.yourseoplan.com/seo-tips/google-loves-me.html</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If dashes don&#8217;t float your boat, you can choose another separator. We believe that underscores and tildes (_, ~ ) are also recognized by Google as word separators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-dashes-in-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
