<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask the Experts: Should I Optimize for Exact Phrase Searches?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-exact-phrase-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-exact-phrase-search/</link>
	<description>Expert SEO Consulting &#38; SEO Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-exact-phrase-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.shocklab.com/?p=491#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>I am happy to embarrass myself if it helps to enlighten others and to draw attention to the misconceptions newbies make. I was looking for a good, low competition keyword for my niche (copywriting) and came across &#039;content for the web&#039;. I&#039;ve now realized WHY it is low competition. It&#039;s all very well if people are searching in quotes for that exact phrase &quot;content for the web&quot; (in fact, I come up on page 8 with that phrase) but if, like most people, they are searching without quotes then I have no chance. Why? Well, I&#039;ve realized that Google omits common words like &#039;for and the&#039;, leaving me competing for the highly popular words &#039;content&#039; and &#039;web&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to embarrass myself if it helps to enlighten others and to draw attention to the misconceptions newbies make. I was looking for a good, low competition keyword for my niche (copywriting) and came across &#8216;content for the web&#8217;. I&#8217;ve now realized WHY it is low competition. It&#8217;s all very well if people are searching in quotes for that exact phrase &#8220;content for the web&#8221; (in fact, I come up on page 8 with that phrase) but if, like most people, they are searching without quotes then I have no chance. Why? Well, I&#8217;ve realized that Google omits common words like &#8216;for and the&#8217;, leaving me competing for the highly popular words &#8216;content&#8217; and &#8216;web&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

